The file
What a run printed
From one real run of this file.team-output/brief.md:
src/triple.mjs:
test/triple.test.mjs:
team-output/approval.md:
The team’s shape
Each step needs the one before it. A review below
reviewThreshold is a
revision request aimed at implement; the implementer runs again with the
findings, then the test and the review run again with it.
Gotchas
- The analyse step writes the note and nothing else. The package compares the expected files before and after the analyse step, and fails it by name if the seat wrote or changed any of them, because a plan written after the code is not a plan. Files that were already in the workspace before the run are left alone.
- The implementer and every reviewer are different model families. The analyse and approve seats are free to share a family with either.
- The approval is a file, not a status.
team-output/approval.mdis what the approve step must leave behind, and the step fails when it is missing or empty. - A writing seat can write anywhere the process can. The files above start their Claude and Codex seats with permission prompts off, which is what lets a model write files. Run them in a directory you are willing to let a model change, and give a reviewing seat a read-only mode if its plugin has one.
Source
The file isexamples/teams/feature-delivery.ts. The
teams package page lists every input.